Every authority, green-tick verified.
Live fetch against Find Case Law and legislation.gov.uk. If a source can't be verified, the AI refuses to cite it.
Give it a matter and it works the file the way you would — runs the ID, AML and conflict checks, drafts the client-care letter and the first version, finds the precedent, and tracks every deadline to the day. You review and sign off. It never advises; you stay the supervising solicitor.
Early access · 30% off, locked 12 months · SRA-aligned audit trail
Built with input from UK solicitors·UK data centres·Solicitor-supervised by design
100%
AI output signed off by a solicitor — never the AI
0
of your client data is stored by the AI or used to train it — zero data retention
6yrs
Audit trail kept — the SRA's retention period
100%
Citations checked against the official source
The product, unscripted
One real matter, worked inside LawFuze — no slides, no mock-ups. You sign off every output before it leaves the firm.
A co-worker that thinks like a lawyer
Ask in plain English — get a grounded, cited answer, flagged for a solicitor to verify before you rely.

Actual product UI · illustrative matter with fictional names & data
What only LawFuze does
Legal AI today comes in three shapes: general chatbots hosted in the US, enterprise suites priced for the largest firms, and single-task drafting add-ins. Each leaves a gap a UK solicitor has to cover. Here is what they miss — and where LawFuze is built to fit.
UK data residency
Every matter is stored in UK data centres. Your COLP can prove client data never left the country.
What competitors doUS tools offer EU residency at best. UK case-management systems often run on shared US/UK clouds.
Supervisor sign-off
Every AI output is drafted, reviewed and approved by a qualified solicitor before it reaches a client. In a firm, the supervising solicitor's SRA number is recorded on the audit trail. As a solo practitioner, you are the supervisor — and your sign-off is logged in exactly the same way.
What competitors doOther tools treat the lawyer as a single user. None build the sign-off step into the workflow itself.
Official case law
Research runs over the official public sources — legislation.gov.uk and The National Archives' Find Case Law — and every case or statute cited in a draft is checked against them before it can leave. An authority that resolves to nothing real is blocked.
What competitors doFree indexes are unofficial mirrors. US tools are US-only. Pan-European tools treat UK case law as an afterthought.
Rule-cited deadlines
For each matter, LawFuze works out the key deadlines and attaches the applicable Civil, Family or Criminal Procedure Rule to each one — so every date carries the rule it comes from.
What competitors doUK case-management ships static templates. Single-purpose drafting tools don't model deadlines. Generic calendars carry no rule citation.
UK pricing
£499/month for a five-fee-earner firm — the mid-market the £20k-a-year enterprise tools won't serve, and the solo practitioner they price out entirely.
What competitors doEnterprise legal-AI is quote-only and built for the largest firms. Single-purpose drafting add-ins solve one slice of the work.
SRA-bound AI
Most legal AI runs your matter through a model whose terms quietly reserve the right to keep your data. LawFuze pins the AI to the SRA Code itself — confidential by design, supervised by default, and built so no third party ever trains on what you're working on.
What competitors doGeneric AI terms reserve broad re-use rights for 'service improvement'. The vendor isn't bound by your professional code — you are. LawFuze holds the AI to it too.
Ten early-access firms. 30% off, locked for 12 months. The founders answer the email.
LawFuze reads the whole file, computes the numbers that matter by rule not by guess, and verifies every authority before it leaves the building. You stay accountable; the AI assists, and every decision is auditable.
Every case and statute in a draft is resolved against The National Archives and legislation.gov.uk. An authority that resolves to nothing real is blocked before it can leave the building — the rest flagged for your sign-off. The post-Ayinde duty, enforced on every draft.
Limitation and court deadlines are worked out by fixed legal rules — not estimated — and re-checked the moment a new fact lands on the file. Impossible to silently miss.
Each significant automated decision is recorded in a tamper-proof DUAA 2025 s.80 log — the inputs, the output, the lawful basis, and the named solicitor who signed it off. Your audit trail writes itself.
From source-of-funds reconstruction to disclosure review, LawFuze reads the entire file and pins every figure and clause to its source document. It surfaces the gap a tired human skims past — it never makes one up.
SDLT, limitation, IHT relief and quantum are calculated by fixed, traceable rules. Every number traces back to a rule and a source — no guesswork on the figures that matter.
Before a single line of firm data reaches any AI, it's checked for legal professional privilege and personal data — and recorded in an AI usage log the COLP can search. The firm can prove, on demand, every time client data touched AI, what it held, and the named fee-earner. The outgoing text is never stored — only a fingerprint of it.
Specialist positions hard-stop to partner sign-off. Capacity prompts never label a client. SARs are never auto-filed. The AI does the work; the solicitor makes the call — always.
The tools behind it · one accountable workspace
Verify & audit
Deadlines & money
Risk & conduct
Litigation & property
The 60-minute intake
A new client at a typical UK firm takes 24 days from first contact to billable work — most of it admin, all of it regulated. LawFuze runs the whole sequence in one supervised AI flow. 20 minutes of fee-earner time, end-to-end.
The prospect tells the AI what happened. Multi-turn, refuses legal advice, classifies practice area, identifies parties, estimates fee band.
DUAA 2025 s.80 — notice + contest baked in
Fuzzy + phonetic name match + Companies House director/PSC traversal. <30 seconds. Anything below 90% confidence routes to COLP.
SRA Code 6.1–6.3 — duty to act in client's best interest
Client photographs their passport + a selfie on their phone. eIDV (Onfido via Thirdfort) — coming at public launch; PG81 Safe-Harbour aligned.
MLR 2017 reg.28 — customer due diligence
Open Banking one-tap consent — statements reviewed, narrative drafted, lawyer approves. Coming at public launch.
MLR 2017 reg.28(11) — source of funds verification
Vetted template by matter type, fee structure, costs estimate. DocuSign Connect e-signature in the same flow.
SRA Code 8.6 + 8.7 — costs information + plain English
Client pays into the firm's segregated client account at ClearBank — a Rule 3 bank, not an EMI. Three-way reconciled automatically.
SRA Accounts Rules 3, 5, 8 — client money
First three tasks seeded from your firm's workflow template. Client gets portal credentials. Welcome pack sent. Named supervising solicitor stamped.
Garfield.Law pattern — named accountable solicitor
1 of 7 playing
The Ayinde defence
Ayinde v Haringey [2025] EWHC 1383 (Admin) made hallucinated authorities a referable SRA matter. We built three defences directly into the platform so every output a LawFuze AI produces is defensible before any tribunal.
Live fetch against Find Case Law and legislation.gov.uk. If a source can't be verified, the AI refuses to cite it.
Priya Shah
Reviewed · 14:32
Every AI output is stamped with the regulated solicitor whose name carries it. No anonymous outputs leave the firm.
14:31:08prompt
Draft position statement on conduct
14:31:24response
AI draft generated · 3 citations
14:31:24verify
Citations green-tick passed
14:32:01review
Priya Shah · approved · note added
Append-only, tamper-proof log. Replay any AI decision end-to-end during a regulator audit.
The same pattern the SRA authorised Garfield.Law on (May 2025): named accountable solicitor on every AI step, refusal-first AI behaviour, citations grounded in verifiable sources. Read the methodology.
Compliance lives in the background
35% of UK compliance officers describe their AML workload as “overwhelming.” The annual SRA questionnaire takes ~80 hours of partner time. LawFuze runs both COLP and COFA loops continuously, so the year-end becomes a sign-off, not a re-construction.
Compliance Officer · Legal Practice
Every flagged AI output lands in your queue with the named supervising solicitor pre-filled. The PII renewal pack, lateral- hire conflict check, weekly regulator digests, ongoing CDD schedule (MLR 2017 reg 27) and SRA 8.3-8.4 complaints register are all auto-prepared from your own records.
Compliance Officer · Finance & Admin
Three-way client-account reconciliation runs daily, not every-5-weeks. Residual balances surface at the 12-month line per SAR 5.1. Client account at ClearBank — never an EMI. The pre-bill time audit (CPR 47) catches vague narratives and round-hour billing before the bill goes out.
Mirrors SRA Authorisation Rule 8.5 (COLP) and the Solicitors Accounts Rules 3 / 5 / 8 (COFA). See the full compliance suite.
Capabilities · live in early access
Six capabilities live in the early access. Three more turn on at public launch on 1 September 2026 at public launch.
Phase 2 · 1 September 2026
Pricing · early access
LawFuze is in paid pre-release for a limited number of UK firms ahead of public launch on 1 September 2026. Early-access firms get the full platform today at 30% off their tier — invoiced quarterly, no card required — with that price locked until 12 months after public launch. Each tier includes a monthly AI-token allowance pooled across your whole firm — you only ever see overage if the firm goes beyond it.
| Plan | For | Early access | List | AI allowance / month | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solo | Sole practitioner · 1 fee-earner | £104 /mo | £149 | 8M tokens≈ 1,000 AI actions | Get Early Access |
| PracticePopular | Small firm · 2–5 fee-earners | £349 /mo | £499 | 30M tokens≈ 3,750 AI actions | Get Early Access |
| Firm | Growing firm · 6–20 fee-earners | £1,049 /mo | £1,499 | 90M tokens≈ 11,000 AI actions | Get Early Access |
| Enterprise | 21+ fee-earners · SSO, DPA | Custom | — | Custom allowanceTailored to your firm | Talk to us |
Sole practitioner · 1 fee-earner · list £149
✓ 8M tokens / month · ≈ 1,000 AI actions
Get Early AccessSmall firm · 2–5 fee-earners · list £499
✓ 30M tokens / month · ≈ 3,750 AI actions
Get Early AccessGrowing firm · 6–20 fee-earners · list £1,499
✓ 90M tokens / month · ≈ 11,000 AI actions
Get Early Access21+ fee-earners · SSO, DPA
✓ Custom allowance / month · Tailored to your firm
Talk to usTen early-access seats — invoiced quarterly by bank transfer, no card on file. Prices exclude VAT. Stripe self-serve billing and VAT invoicing go live at public launch on 1 September 2026.
Ten UK early-access firms are joining the paid pre-release — 30% off their tier, invoiced quarterly, with that price locked for 12 months from public launch.
Get Early Access